Teach Yourself Japanese
Subject: Re: one-dimensional
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 16:22:48 GMT
References: 1, 2, 3, 4
> But how can something one-dimensional be thick necessarily, at least, two-dimensional?
I suspect that in this case, "one-dimensional" is operating as a descriptive term, rather than scientific one.
Reply to this message
Show this thread
Return to the index
Program Copyright(C) TAKASUGI Shinji (tssf.airnet.ne.jp)